Open Data in Cultural Heritage Institutions: Can We Be Better Than Data Brokers?

本文将文化机构的收藏作为数据来对待,鼓励采用新的方法来使用历史收藏。

作者:S.L. Ziegler , Louisiana State University Libraries

转载来源:Digital Humanities Quarterly, 2020: 14.2, http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/14/2/000462/000462.html

本文将文化机构的收藏作为数据来研究,鼓励采用新的方法来使用历史收藏。将收藏重新构建为数据,是为了关注如何将数字化的材料收藏、元数据收藏和转录信息用于和再次用于各种类型的计算分析。长期以来,活跃在数字人文领域的学者们一直在利用计算性数据。本文关注的是文化遗产机构的工作,它们越来越多地提供藏品作为数据。本文概述了作为数据项目的馆藏,并考察了活跃在这一空间的文化机构的具体例子。然后,本文详细介绍了数据经纪人的实践,并探讨了数据代理模型如何在文化遗产机构中构建数据使用框架。最后,描述了一些可能有助于减轻文化机构中数据可能造成的伤害的实验。当我们创建和共享数据时,我们能确定自己比数据代理更好吗?

作者简介:

S.L. Ziegler 

S. L. Ziegler is Head of Digital Programs and Services at LSU Libraries in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, where they manage the digitization initiatives, digital preservation operations, and the digital library infrastructure. They build partnerships throughout the state of Louisiana to ensure long-term access to at-risk digital cultural heritage material. Before joining LSU Libraries, Ziegler was the Head of Digital Scholarship and Technology at the American Philosophical Society in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where they were the founding head of the Center for Digital Scholarship and oversaw all aspects of digital production and outreach.

en_GBEnglish